• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Engineering
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Undergraduate Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Nilai Risiko Proyek Konstruksi menggunakan Qualitative Risk Analysis (Studi Kasus : Proyek Revitalisasi Komplek Stadion Kebun Bunga Medan, Sumatera Utara)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover.pdf (810.2Kb)
    Fulltext (3.773Mb)
    Date
    2023
    Author
    Harahap, Muhammad Fiqri Halomoan
    Advisor(s)
    Syahrizal
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Construction projects are a form of activity that takes place within a limited period of time. Likewise with construction projects in the city of Medan. The implementation of a construction project anywhere and in any form will never avoid risk, be it small-scale or large-scale risks. Based on this background, it is necessary to conduct research to determine the level of risk in a project. This research aims to analyze the risk value of construction projects in the Kebun Bunga Stadium Complex Revitalization Project in Medan City, North Sumatra. This research uses the qualitative risk analysis method which has two objectives, namely risk identification and initial risk assessment. Furthermore, the steps taken are identification and classification of risks, and analysis of risk values and also use the help of statistical software, namely SPSS V.22 to conduct validity and reliability tests. Valid and reliable requirements are if the validity value of r count> r table and Cronbach's alpha value> r table. After that, the risk will be categorized based on the severity index value, and to determine the level of risk, a risk profile map is used as well as an assessment of the risk using qualitative risk analysis. Based on data processing, there are 32 (thirty-two) risk factors that qualify after validity and reliability tests. Likewise with the risk level, there are 42 (forty-two) eligible risk factors. From the results of the risk profile map, a low risk level of 25 (59.52%) was obtained and 17 risk factors (40.47%) were tolerable. There are two most dominant risk factors, namely the manager's inability to manage in the field and the inappropriate formwork removal time. The dominant risk factor is risk retention. So as to minimize the possibility of loss and reduce the severity if a risk occurs
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/91609
    Collections
    • Undergraduate Theses [1577]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV