• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Perbandingan Putusan Hakim terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika yang Direhabilitasi dan Dihukum Pidana Penjara (Studi pada Pengadilan Negeri Pematangsiantar)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (374.8Kb)
    Fulltext (1.310Mb)
    Date
    2023
    Author
    Harianja, Ester Lauren Putri
    Advisor(s)
    Mulyadi, Mahmud
    Marlina
    Andriati, Syarifah Lisa
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study aims to compare judicial decisions concerning rehabilitated and criminally sentenced narcotics offenders. There are a total of 8 cases reviewed, consisting of 6 cases involving drug abusers and 2 cases involving drug traffickers. Out of the drug abuser cases, 2 resulted in prison sentences, while 4 led to rehabilitation orders. The issues addressed include: 1) Regulation of the categorization of narcotics abusers within the prevailing criminal justice system; 2) a comparison of sentencing between rehabilitated narcotics offenders and those sentenced to prison, with a case study of the Pematangsiantar District Court decisions; and 3) Challenges in rehabilitating narcotics users within medical/social rehabilitation institutions, in connection with the case study of Pematangsiantar District Court decisions that apply a relative sentencing objective. This research is a normative legal study of a descriptive-analytical nature, employing both statutory and case-based approaches. The research utilizes secondary data derived from judgments of the Pematangsiantar District Court and is gathered through field study techniques conducted at the Pematangsiantar District Court's Clerical Division. Interviews were conducted with the judges handling the cases. Data analysis is performed using qualitative data analysis methods. Research Results: The categorization of narcotics abusers is governed by Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics; In the case study of Pematangsiantar District Court, there were 4 cases that correctly applied the retributive sentencing objective, which is corrective punishment. On the other hand, 4 other cases did not align with the sentencing objective and instead applied relative retribution; Implementing the rehabilitation of narcotics abuse into medical/social rehabilitation institutions faced substantial, structural, and cultural obstacles. Recommendations: It is necessary to promptly draft an Amendment Bill to the Narcotics Law; Ideally, judges at the Pematangsiantar District Court should first categorize perpetrators of narcotics offenses. Additionally, society, especially families of narcotics abusers, should provide extensive support to those who abuse and are addicted to narcotics.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/91726
    Collections
    • Master Theses [1833]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara (RI-USU)
    Universitas Sumatera Utara | Perpustakaan | Resource Guide | Katalog Perpustakaan
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV