Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Secara Bersama-Sama yang Mengakibatkan Kematian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Stabat Nomor 467/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Stb dan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Brebes Nomor 52/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Bbs)

Abstract

Phenomenon many action persecution which happen of public dilate back by several things among them, situation economy perpetrator, emotions perpetrator which not yet stable, how perpetrator raised of in family or victim which fishing happen violence so that result death. like in Decision Courtstate Number 467/Pid.B/2022/PN.Stb and Decision Courtstate Number 52/Pid.B/2020/PN.Bbs. on second the decision do follow criminal persecution regularly together-same which result death. Based on from description background back, problem which studied, ie: 1. How arrangement law about follow criminal persecution regularly together-same which result death, 2. How accountability criminal to perpetrator follow criminal persecution regularly together-same which result death, 3. How dropping criminal to perpetrator follow criminal persecution regularly together-same which result death based on Decision Number 467/Pid.B/2022/PN.Stb and Decision Number 52/Pid.B/2020/PN.Bbs. Study This use study law normative that is study which study basic or principle law. Approaching study thesis this is approach law-law, approach case and approach analytical. Approach law-law done with examine law-law and regulations Which related. Method analysis data which use disc analysis data qualitative, as results from data collection through data first, second and tertiary. Conclusion in study show that accountability criminal to perpetrator criminalpersecution regularly together-same which result death, arranged in chapter 351 sentence (3) because, chapter 55 sentence (1) the-1 Criminal Code and convicted with criminal prison most old 7 (seven). Indecision the first, dropping criminal which given Assembly Judge to for defendants with decision punishment, with criminal prison during 1 (one) year 7 (seven) moon with addition restitution. However on decision which first criminal dropped too light compared to with decision which the two which dropping the verdict enough heavy. However decision which second no There is giving restitution or compensation to victim so that second decision with loss which experienced family victim become fair.