Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSutiarnoto
dc.contributor.advisorLeviza, Jelly
dc.contributor.advisorAffila
dc.contributor.authorSinaga, Nurhayati M
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-05T02:41:40Z
dc.date.available2024-08-05T02:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/94754
dc.description.abstractLaw on Hypothecation provides privilege for a creditor as the first holder of hypothecation to do objet execution on his own authority through public subscription, and the loan payoff is taken from the auction with the priority right of other creditors through execution parate, based on executorial title in the Hypothecation Certificate. In the APHT, the vacancy of the collateral during the time of hypothecation execution, basically has been agreed according to Article 11, paragraph (2), point K of UUHT so that the debtor is required to cmply with the result of auction, and he does not the right to refuse vacating. There is a conflict in Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Universal in which the debtor does not pay off his debt which is based on the contract so that the creditor, Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Universal, in Pontianak, does the execution of the collateral by public auction. The debtor, on the other hand, files legal opposition (verzet) and complaint in the Case No. 193/Pdt.G/2019/PNPtk. This has cause the auction winner cannot do transfer title or control the auction he has already won. The result of the research shows that filing lawsuit against Illegal Offense to the Court to Blockage Petitioner and the Land Office to remove the blockage as the legal protection for the auction winner. Besides that, the auction winner can file a requestfor the execution ofvacating the auction object to the District Court. In the Verdict No. 193/Pd1.G/2019/PN.Pk, the Panel ofJudges considers that the collateral used as the hypothecation by the Plaintiffhas the sake executorialforce as the court Verdict which is final and conclusive, based n executorial title, foreclosure sale can be directly carried out, and the debtor is required to leave/vacate the collateral: What has been done by the Plaintiff is considered illegal offense because he has violated other people's civil rights iAn order to avoid juridical obstacles. It is expected that the government can make a change and addition of clauses in the UUHT by giving the authority or directly appointing a bailiffand police officer to do execution ofthe hypothecation so that KPKNJ ad the Bank can synergize with the regulation by doing the procedure of the foreclosure sale based on the Decree of the Minister of Finance and the auction letter certificate.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectlegal certaintyen_US
dc.subjectcollateral auctionen_US
dc.subjectexecution ofhypothecationen_US
dc.subjectSDGsen_US
dc.titleKepastian Hukum terhadap Pemenang Lelang dalam Lelang Agunan Bank (Studi Kasus pada Putusan Nomor 193/Pdt.G/2019/PN.Ptk)en_US
dc.title.alternativeLegal Certainty on The Winner of The Auction in The Auction of Bank Collateral (Case Study on Decision Number193 / Pdt.G/2019 / PN.Ptk)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM207011073
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0010105626
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0001087301
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0030127505
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI74102#Kenotariatan
dc.description.pages131 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record