Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorZahedi
dc.contributor.authorSaragih, Winona Nova Meilinda
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-08T01:58:28Z
dc.date.available2024-08-08T01:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/95080
dc.description.abstractThe performance of conventional commercial banks can be determined from several parameters included in the RGEC analysis (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital). This is done to help all parties such as customers, shareholders, and regulators understand the extent of the bank's stability, health and capability in dealing with various economic situations. In addition, this analysis also supports investment decision making, banking sector supervision and maintaining public confidence in the banking industry. Indicators in the RGEC analysis used include Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Return on Assets (ROA), Net Interest Margin (NIM), Non-Performing Loan (NPL), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR), Operating Costs to Operating Income (BOPO), NPL Level, ROA Level and Bank Rating according to the Indonesian Securities Rating Agency (PEFINDO). The decision tree method used in this comparative analysis is QUEST (Quick, Unbiased, Efficient, and Statistical Tree) which will produce a binary classification tree and CHAID (Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection) which will produce a non binary classification tree. The results showed that QUEST produces indicators of BOPO, ROA, NPL and Bank Rating while CHAID produces indicators of NPL, ROA, LDR, and BOPO as the most significant indicators in predicting the performance of conventional commercial banks. The results of the indicator analysis produced by the two decision tree methods will be compared and analyzed in detail using the confusion matrix.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectBank Performanceen_US
dc.subjectCHAIDen_US
dc.subjectConventional Banken_US
dc.subjectRGECen_US
dc.subjectQUESTen_US
dc.subjectSDGsen_US
dc.titleAnalisis Perbandingan Metode Pohon Keputusan Quest dan Chaid Dalam Menilai Kinerja Bank Umum Konvensionalen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparative Analysis of Quest and Chaid Decision Tree Methods in Assessing The Performance of Conventional Commercial Banksen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM200803099
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0016096101
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI44201#Matematika
dc.description.pages106 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record