Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHamdi, Tasrif
dc.contributor.advisorTanjung, Qadri F
dc.contributor.authorSinaga, Ade Putra Fratama
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T03:45:37Z
dc.date.available2024-08-22T03:45:37Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/95913
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Intubation is a crucial maneuver performed during anesthesia procedures. The act of intubating with an endotracheal tube is a definitive airway management technique that provides maximal protection against the occurrence of aspiration of stomach contents or fluids. Endotracheal intubation is a rapid, simple, and safe non-operative technique that facilitates all objectives of airway management. Several studies indicate that the proper positioning of the head and neck is one of the most important steps in laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Some studies recommend the use of a head pillow to improve the laryngoscopic view by enhancing the occipito- atlanto-axial angle and enlarging the submandibular space. Methods: The design of this study was a randomized cross-sectional study with two research groups conducted at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan (RSUP HAM) to compare the difficulty levels of intubation using the technique with and without a pillow. Results: In this study, the average age + SD for the group without a pillow was approximately 49.4 ± 12.1 years, and for the group with a pillow, it was approximately 44.3 ± 14.4 years. The majority of subjects in the group without a pillow were male (7 subjects), while in the group with a pillow, the majority were female (7 subjects). The BMI distribution for group 1 had an average + SD of 21.0 ± 1.65 kg/m², and group 2 had an average + SD of 21.8 ± 1.85 kg/m². The ASA distribution in the group without a pillow was mainly ASA 1, whereas in the group with a pillow, both ASA 1 and ASA 2 had the same frequency. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups. According to the Wilson score for predicting difficult intubation, most research subjects were predicted to have easy and not too difficult intubations in both groups, with and without a pillow. Patients without a pillow often required a little assistance during intubation, while the majority of patients using a pillow were easily intubated. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05). Patients intubated without a pillow had an average score of 15.9±1.6, while those intubated with a pillow had an average score of 10.8±1.8, showing a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.05). Using the Cormack-Lehane score, most patients without a pillow were at grade 2, while the majority of patients with a pillow were at grade 1. A significant difference was found between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: Patients intubated without a pillow often required a little assistance, while the majority of patients intubated with a pillow were easily intubated; however, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05).en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectIntubationen_US
dc.subjectPillowen_US
dc.subjectSDGsen_US
dc.titlePerbandingan Tingkat Kesulitan Intubasi dengan Menggunakan Bantal dan tanpa Bantal di Ruang Operasi RSUP H Adam Maliken_US
dc.title.alternativeCorrelation Analysis of Lemon, IDS, and WILSON Scores in Assessingintubation Difficulty in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesiaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM207041057
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0025058504
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI11103#Ilmu Kedokteran Klinis
dc.description.pages87 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeTesis Magisteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record