Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAisyah, Dara
dc.contributor.authorSihite, Gloria Inriani
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-05T07:06:04Z
dc.date.available2024-09-05T07:06:04Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/96797
dc.description.abstractThe Indonesia Smart Program is one of the government's efforts to improve the quality of education and reduce social disparities in accessing education throughout Indonesia for underprivileged families. The Indonesia Smart program is very supportive to realize a 9-year compulsory primary education program and universal secondary education or 12-year compulsory education. The policy phenomenon in the field of education, precisely in the school of SMA Negeri 1 Medan City which is registered with the North Sumatra Provincial Education Office, the problem that exists is that the implementation of the Smart Indonesia program is not running effectively and inefficiently at SMA Negeri 1 Medan City. Therefore, this study aims to find out and describe the evaluation of the Indonesia Smart program at SMA Negeri 1 Medan City which is registered with the North Sumatra Provincial Education Office. This study uses a descriptive research method with a qualitative approach, data collection techniques are carried out by interviewing, observing and recording documents related to the implementation of the Indonesia Smart program. The data obtained was then analyzed qualitatively by reviewing all the collected data supported by the results of interviews with a theoretical approach put forward by Dunn (2003) through Brainstorming indicators, Argumentation Analysis, and User Surveys. From the results of this research, it can be seen that the implementation of the Smart Indonesia Program must be further improved in verifying participants who register for the Smart Indonesia Program, because this program still has the phenomenon of not being on target and inequality in the provision of aid funds for the Smart Indonesia Program. There are still many recipients of PIP assistance funds at SMAN 1, especially in class X, who have not received assistance funds from the Smart Indonesia Program. One of the factors that supports inaccurate targeting is the existence of asynchronous data verification factors. So, PIP recipients receive financial assistance even though the students are capable. Then there was falsification of data provided by prospective recipient participants with data that already existed at the Ministry of Education and Culture.en_US
dc.language.isoiden_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectBrainstormingen_US
dc.subjectArgumentation Analysisen_US
dc.subjectUser Surveyen_US
dc.subjectSmart Indonesian Program (PIP)en_US
dc.subjectSDGsen_US
dc.titleStudi Evaluasi Implementasi Program Indonesia Pintar yang Terdaftar di Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Sumatera Utara (Studi Kasus di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Kota Medan)en_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation Study of the Implementation of the Indonesia Smart Program Registered at the Education Office of North Sumatra Province (Case Study at High School State 1 Medan City)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nimNIM200903047
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0018116906
dc.identifier.kodeprodiKODEPRODI63201#Ilmu Administrasi Publik
dc.description.pages193 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record