• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses (Notary)
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses (Notary)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis Yuridis Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Atas Harga yang Telah Disepakati Bersama (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.602 K/Pdt/2020)

    Juridical Analysis on Default in Purchasing Agreement on The Previous Agreed Price (A Study on The Supreme Court Ruling No. 602 K/Pdt/2020)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (1.268Mb)
    Fulltext (1.901Mb)
    Date
    2023
    Author
    Hutasoit, Harisoni
    Advisor(s)
    Ikhsan, Edy
    Ekaputra, Mohammad
    Sidabariba, Burhan
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    For the validity of a contract specified in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, four requirements are needed: agreement between two parties, ability to make it, specific case, and a halal cause since a contract is made as the legal understanding. The agreement is expected to be able to run normally; but, in practice, in a certain condition, the change in performance does not run well which often causes default as in the case of the Supreme Court Ruling No. 602 K/Pdt/2020. The research uses juridical normative approach. The data are secondary data, obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. They are gathered by conducting library research and analyzed qualitatively to get descriptive research result. The result of the research shows that the purchasing agreement in which the payment is done by installment/credit does not specify the term for redemption in the APJB (Purchase Contract Deed). The research problems are as follows: how about the legal consequence of a APJB which does not specify the term for redemption and how about the legal protection for the harmed party caused by default. Judges' decision in the Ruling No. 602K/Pdt/2020 does not consider juridical factors such as the requirement for the validity of a contract specified in Article 1320 and Article 1338 of the Civil Code. All valid contracts are laws for the related parties, contrary to the principle of evidence on the APJB made before a Notary and contrary to the principle of legal certainty (Pacta Sunt Servenda). A Purchase Contract which does not specify the term of redemption can cause legal uncertainty which potentially brings about a conflict. One of the legal principles of a contract is the principle of legal protection for the related parties, especially the harmed party who can do revocation, revocation plus compensation, and compensation. It is recommended that the parties who make a contract or agreement fulfill the articles and the content of the contract. A contract can be revoked based on the agreement of both parties who have made it. Actually, a contract should be made based on good faith.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/97697
    Collections
    • Master Theses (Notary) [2259]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV