Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPutri, Dian Marisha
dc.contributor.advisorSyahputra, Fikry Prastya
dc.contributor.authorSidauruk, Eunike
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T08:46:08Z
dc.date.available2024-10-16T08:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/98300
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to identify hate speech in the comments column from several TikTok accounts on posts about the Ferdy Sambo case using a pragmatic approach. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. The information in this research was taken from comments from several TikTok accounts that were posted regarding the Ferdy Sambo case which went viral in 2022. There were 45 haters' comments related to the type of hate speech and the intention of the hate speech to Ferdy Sambo in TikTok. The results found 5 types of hate speech related to netizen comments, namely as follows: referring to 20 class types of hate speech, 17 behavior, 4 religion, 3 physical, and 1 sexual orientation. Class is the type of hate speech that is the most dominant in netizen comments regarding the Ferdy Sambo case. On the other hand, based on the intention of the hate speech, it was found that there were 4, namely as follows: 25 insulting, 18 insinuating, 1 mocking, and 1 blaming. The most dominant intention of hate speech based on netizen comments is insulting.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Sumatera Utaraen_US
dc.subjectHate Speechen_US
dc.subjectTypesen_US
dc.subjectIntentionsen_US
dc.subjectTikToken_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Hate Speech on Tiktok Comments in Ferdy Sambo’s Case Posten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0129109002
dc.identifier.nidnNIDN0014089206
dc.description.pages96 Pagesen_US
dc.description.typeSkripsi Sarjanaen_US
dc.subject.sdgsSDGs 9. Industry Innovation And Infrastructureen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record