• Login
    View Item 
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    •   USU-IR Home
    • Faculty of Law
    • Master Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Perjanjian Sewa Beli Mobil antara Konsumen dan PT. Adira Cabang Ternate (Studi Putusan PN Nomor 37/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Tte)

    Juridical Review on Illegal Offense in Car Rental Contract Between a Consumer and PT. Adira, Ternate Branch Office (A Study on The Verdict No. 37/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Ite)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Cover (799.4Kb)
    Fulltext (1.242Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    P, Miki Yanti
    Advisor(s)
    Ikhsan, Edy
    Barus, Utary Maharany
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The case of illegal offense in a car rental contract in District Court Verdict No. 37/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Tte is committed by PT Adira, Ternate Branch Office, which confiscates the collateral by coercion without any first and second warnings and sells/auctions it without the acknowledge of the consumer. The research problems are as follows: how is the implementation of the car rental contract between the two parties, what factors cause the incidence of illegal offense committed by PT. Adira, Ternate Branch Office, how about the judge's legal consideration in the study on the Verdict No. 37/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Tte concerning the car rental contract between the two parties. The research uses a normative research method with a descriptive analytic design, as well as a case-study and statute approach. The data are collected by conducting library research and analyzed qualitatively. The research concludes that the implementation of the car rental contract between PT Adira, Ternate Branch Office and the consumer fulfills the legal provisions of a contract in Indonesia according to Article 1338 in conjunction with Article 1320 of the Civil Code. It is only concerned with the factor of error without any forethought and with poor faith, which violates Article 7 of Law No 8/1999 on Consumer Protection. The Ternate District Court Verdict No. 37/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Tte does not fulfill the principle of pacta sunt servanda or legal certainty as specified in Article 1338 of the Civil Code. It is recommended that the consumer and the businessperson pay attention to the content of the contract clearly and the latter give correct, clear, and fair information concerning the confiscating and auctioning of the collateral. The panel of judges should hand down the verdict by paying more attention to the facts in the hearing and the testimony so that the verdict is legally correct and fair.
    URI
    https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/98521
    Collections
    • Master Theses [1848]

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of USU-IRCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit DateThis CollectionBy Issue DateTitlesAuthorsAdvisorsKeywordsTypesBy Submit Date

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Repositori Institusi Universitas Sumatera Utara - 2025

    Universitas Sumatera Utara

    Perpustakaan

    Resource Guide

    Katalog Perpustakaan

    Journal Elektronik Berlangganan

    Buku Elektronik Berlangganan

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV